PROSOPOGRAPHIC PORTRAIT OF S. IGIBAEV: SOCIAL TRAJECTORY, PROFESSIONAL IDENTITY, AND INSTITUTIONAL ROLE

Authors

  • Альбина Жанбосинова L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University image/svg+xml
  • J. JMazhitova «Медицинский университет Астана» , Astana Medical University , «Медицинский университет Астана» , «Медицинский университет Астана» , «Медицинский университет Астана»

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26577/

Keywords:

Kazakhstan, intellectual history, biographica, prosopography, historical science, personal history, Igibaev

Abstract

The relevance of the proposed author's research is determined by the increasing interest of modern humanities in personal history and intellectual biography as a tool for analyzing scientific schools, mechanisms for the formation of research traditions and the dynamics of the development of national historiography. In the context of the methodological renewal of Kazakh historical science, the appeal to the figures of scientists who have made a significant contribution to the development of scientific and thematic areas is of particular importance. In this context, the scientific biography of Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor Sovetkhan Kabdualievich is an important example of the interaction of individual research trajectory, institutional building and transformation of the academic space of Kazakhstan in the second half of the twentieth – early twenty-first century. The purpose of the authors' research is to reconstruct the scientific path of S. Igibaev, identify the key stages of his professional development, analyze his methodological approaches and assess his contribution to the development of Russian historiography, source studies and regional research schools. The methodological basis was formed by the biographical method, intellectual and historical analysis and source expertise, which made it possible to trace the evolution of his scientific interests and conceptual constructions. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the comprehensive consideration of S. Igibayev's legacy as part of the intellectual history of Kazakhstan, as well as in identifying his role in the institutionalization of historical education and the formation of the research environment at East Kazakhstan State University. Special attention is paid to the combination of classical methods of historical research with interdisciplinary approaches, which allowed the scientist to expand the source base and offer new interpretations of the social history of pre-revolutionary Kazakhstan. The results of the author's work show that S. Igibaev's activity had a significant impact on the development of thematic areas of Russian historiography, the training of a new generation of researchers and the strengthening of the regional scientific historical school. S. Igibayev's biography reflects the typological features of academic training and the formation of scientists of historical science of Kazakhstan in the Soviet and post-Soviet periods, and his scientific works have become an important element in the formation of a national intellectual tradition. The significance of the research lies in the fact that at the current stage there is an increasing need for further development of intellectual history, biography and prosopography as key tools for analyzing historical knowledge of Kazakhstan.

References

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Homo Academicus. Paris, 320. https://ru.scribd.com/document/57191989/Bourdieu-Pierre-Homo-Academicus

Foucault, M. (1969). L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: GALLIMARD Publ., 360.

Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe, (2004). by O. Brunner (Editor), W. Conze (Editor), R. Koselleck (Editor). Bände 1–8. Klett-Cotta Publ, 9090.

Greenblatt, S. (1980) Renaissance Self-Fashioning. Chicago-London: University of Chicago Press, 321 р.

Elias, N. (1993) Mozart: Portrait of a Genius. Berkeley, 152.

Pocock, J. (2009). Political Thought and History: Essays on Theory and Method. Cambridge University Press, 298.

Skinner, Q. (1999). Rhetoric and conceptual change. Finnish yearbook of political though, 3(1), Р. 60-73. doi: 10.7227/R.3.1.5

Skinner, Q. (2002). Visions of Politics.Volume 1: Regarding. Method Cambridge University Press, 209.

Stone, L. (1971). Prosopography. Historical Studies Today, 100, 46-79.

Беленький, И.Л. (2010) Биография и биографика в отечественной культурно-исторической традиции // История через личность: Историческая биография сегодня / Под ред. Л. П. Репиной. 2-е изд. Москва: Квадрига, 37-54.

Дмитриев, А. (2004) Контекст и метод (предварительные соображения об одной становящейся исследовательской индустрии). Новое литературное обозрение, 66, 6-16.

Дмитриев, А. (2004) Марксизм без пролетариата: Георг Лукач и ранняя Франкфуртская школа. 1920–1930-е гг. СПб.: Изд. Европейского ун-та, Летний сад, 528.

Игибаев, С. (1991) Промышленные рабочие дореволюционного Казахстана (1861-1917). Алма-Ата: Ғылым, 192.

Игибаев, С. (1994) Кочевые народы северного причерноморья в повестях Древней Руси (XI-XII в.в). Алматы: Ғылым, 26.

Игибаев, С. (2004) Образование тюркского каганата и его распад. Усть-Каменогорск, 116.

Игибаев, С. (2010) Казахстан в источниках и материалах. Усть-Каменогорск, 394.

Игибаев, С. (2012) Историография истории Казахстана. Древность – начало XX века. Усть-Каменогорск, 184.

Игибаев, С. (2013) История Казахстана в источниках и материалах: учеб. пособие. Астана: Фолиант, 320.

Игибаев, С. (2016) Общественный строй казахов до октябрьского переворота 1917 года в историографии. Вестник КазНУ. Сер. историческая. (2) 20-28.

Игибаев, С. (2021) Актуальные проблемы истории Казахстана. Усть-Каменогорск, 329.

История (2010) через личность: Историческая биография сегодня / Под ред. Л. П. Репиной. – 2-е изд. – Москва: Квадрига, 720.

Классика (2009) и классики в социальном и гуманитарном знании. Под ред. И.М. Савельевой, А.В. Полетаева. Москва: Новое литературное обозрение, 536.

Маргулан, А. (2004) Избранные труды. Алматы, 544 с.

Репина, Л. (2006) История исторического знания: пособие для вузов / А. П. Репина, В. В. Зверева, М. Ю. Парамонова. Москва: Дрофа, 288 с.

Репина, Л. (2011). Историческая наука на рубеже XX – XXI вв.: социальные теории и историографическая практика. Москва: Кругъ, 560 с.

Румянцева, М. (2019) Историческое знание и историческая память в структуре исторической культуры. Диалог со временем. Вып. 67, 41-54. https://roii.ru/r/1/67.4

Савельева, И., Полетаев, А. (2011) Социальная организация знаний о прошлом: аналитическая схема // Диалог со временем. Альманах интеллектуальной истории. Вып. 35. Москва: ИВИ РАН, 7-18.

Сатпаев К. Научное наследие. Алматы, 2010, 273 с.

Published

2026-09-20

Issue

Section

Section 1 National history

How to Cite

PROSOPOGRAPHIC PORTRAIT OF S. IGIBAEV: SOCIAL TRAJECTORY, PROFESSIONAL IDENTITY, AND INSTITUTIONAL ROLE. (2026). Journal of History, 122(3). https://doi.org/10.26577/